FrittForum Debatt Hovedsiden FrittForum Debatt

 HjelpHjelp   SøkSøk   GrupperGrupper   Bli MedlemBli Medlem 
 ProfilProfil   Sjekk private meldingerSjekk private meldinger   Logg InnLogg Inn 

Kreft er en overlevelsesmekanisme og ingen sykdom

Start Nytt Tema   Svar på Tema    FrittForum Debatt Hovedsiden -> Forskjellig - Alt som ikke passer i andre grupper
Vis Forrige Tema :: Vis Neste Tema  
Av Innlegg

Ble Medlem: 16 Aug 2008
Innlegg: 2565
Bosted: Norge

InnleggSkrevet: 18 10 09 21:31    Tittel: Kreft er en overlevelsesmekanisme og ingen sykdom Svar med Sitat

Litt "alternativt", men dette var kontroversielt nok til å være interessant bare pga. påstanden, synes jeg. Men det korte avsnittet jeg siterer nedenfor virker både logisk og gjennomtenkt.

Wisdom of Cancer Cells

Cancer cells are not part of a malicious disease process. When cancer cells spread (metastasize) throughout the body, it is not their purpose or goal to disrupt the body's vitals functions, infect healthy cells and obliterate their host (the body). Self-destruction is not the theme of any cell unless, of course, it is old and worn-out and ready to be turned-over and replaced. Cancer cells, like all other cells, know that if the body dies, they will die as well. Just because some people assume that cancer cells are there to destroy the body does not mean cancer cells have such a purpose or ability.

A cancerous tumor is neither the cause of progressive destruction nor does it actually lead to the death of the body. There is nothing in a cancer cell that has even remotely the ability to kill anything. What eventually leads to the demise of an organ or the entire body is the wasting away of cell tissue resulting from continued deprivation of nutrients and life force. The drastic reduction or shutdown of vital nutrient supplies to the cells of an organ is not primarily a consequence of a cancerous tumor, but actually its biggest cause.

By definition, a cancer cell is a normal, healthy cell that has undergone genetic mutation to the point that it can live in an anaerobic surrounding (an environment where oxygen is not available). In other words, if you deprive a group of cells of vital oxygen (their primary source of energy), some of them will die, but others will manage to alter their genetic software program and mutate in a most ingenious way: the cells will be able to live without oxygen and derive some of their energy needs from such things as cellular metabolic waste products.

It may be easier to understand the cancer cells phenomenon when comparing it with the behavior of common microorganisms. Bacteria, for example, are divided into two main groups, aerobic and anaerobic, meaning, those that need to use oxygen and those that can live without it. This is important to understand since we have more bacteria in our body than we have cells. Aerobic bacteria thrive in an oxygenated environment. They are responsible for helping us with the digestion of food and manufacturing of important nutrients, such as B-vitamins. Anaerobic bacteria, on the other hand, can appear and thrive in an environment where oxygen does not reach. They break down waste materials, toxic deposits and dead, worn-out cells.

The body sees the cancer as being such an important defense mechanism that it even causes the growth of new blood vessels to guarantee the much-needed supply of glucose and, therefore, survival and spreading of the cancer cells. It knows that cancer cells do not cause but, prevent death; at least for a while, until the wasting away of an organ leads to the demise of the entire organism. If the trigger mechanisms for cancer (causal factors) are properly taken care of, such an outcome can be avoided.

It is commonly believed that our immune system protects us against cancer. However, this is only partially true. On the one hand, the immune system readily destroys the millions of cancer cells that a healthy human body produces as part of the daily turnover of 30 billion cells. On the other hand, the immune system takes no action to eradicate cancer cells that develop in response to a build up of toxins, congestion and emotional stress.

Cancers and all other tissues in the body are larded with cancer-killing white cells, such as T-cells. In the case of kidney cancer and melanomas, for example, white cells make up 50 per cent of the mass of the cancers. Since these T-cells easily recognize foreign or mutated cell tissue such as cancer cells, you would expect these immune cells to attack cancer cells right away. However, the immune system allows cancer cells to recruit it to actually increase and spread the cancer to other parts of the body. Cancer cells produce specific proteins that tell the immune cells to leave them alone and help them to grow

Why would the immune system want to collaborate with cancer cells to make more or larger tumors? Because cancer is a survival mechanism, not a disease. The body uses the cancer to keep deadly carcinogenic substances and caustic metabolic waste matter away from the lymph and blood and, therefore, from the heart, brain and other vital organs. Killing off cancer cells would in fact jeopardize its survival. Cleansing the body of accumulated toxins and waste products through the various cleansing methods advocated in my book Timeless Secrets of Health and Rejuvenation ( removes the need for cancer.

Cancer is not a disease; it is the final and most desperate survival mechanism the body has at its disposal. It only takes control of the body when all other measures of self-preservation have failed. To truly heal cancer and what it represents in a person's life we must come to the understanding that the reason the body allows some of its cells to grow in abnormal ways is in its best interest and not an indication that it is about to destroy itself. Cancer is a healing attempt by the body for the body. Blocking this healing attempt can destroy the body. Supporting the body in its healing efforts can save it.

Andreas Moritz's book, Cancer is not a Disease - It's a Survival Mechanism, explains the root causes of cancer and how to eliminate them for good. Available through or


Det snur verden på hue dette, men argumentasjonen er jo logisk. Kan det være riktig?

Man savner storskalastudier, som bekrefter dette. Kanskje finnes det slike? Skjønt så langt som dette befinner seg fra vanlig kreftbehandling, er vel dét mer enn tvilsomt? Men, hva om det er noe i dette? Da er vel dagens kreftbehandling ganske langt på jordet?

De eneste jeg fant av faktiske erfaringer i farten var et par leseranmeldelser fra kreftrammede lesere av boken, som begge synes å anbefale den behandlingen den beskriver:

By Jan B: Be Informed of Your Options
I was diagnosed with breast cancer in March 2009. After a biopsy, an MRI and consulting with a surgeon, oncologist and radiologist, it appeared that I needed to do more research regarding my situation. None of the doctors mentioned or even suggested about getting to the root cause of why I had cancer. That to me was extremely disturb-ing. Treating only the symptom and not the cause was not what I wanted to do. A dear friend recommended Mr. Moritz's book "Cancer Is Not A Disease" which I have read and reread. I am following the regimen stated in the book and am doing terrific. Let's keep the options open for CHOICE. It is still our CHOICE and not that of some group, government entity or pharmaceutical company that should be making these decisions for us (individuals).

By Nicholas Johnstone: Medical profession way behind
'Cancer is not disease' highlights what little the medical profession is generally doing about the root causes of cancer. After my left kidney was removed due to a malignant tumour, the only advice I got, after requesting it, was 'don't eat too much sugar'. So they are doing a great job at treating the symptoms, but there's very little advice on what to do to stop it recurring. This book does just that. Diet and lifestyle changes are emphasized - and can only do the reader who has had cancer, or doesn't want it in the first place - good. The billions of dollars involved from the medical treatment required (chemotherapy and the like) and the pharmaceutical companies 'peddling' the drugs does make one wonder what the incentive is to focus on stopping the cancer cells appearing in the first place.

Og en leser med sterke motforestillinger:
by M. Firestone: Deadly misinformation
Another anti-science author who will dupe the gullible into their graves. I have worked in public health for 27 years, much of that with epidemiologists. I am constantly amazed by the dangerous woo that people will swallow, much to their peril. There is certainly a mind-body connection, but it does not begin to explain cancer.
Published 4 months ago by M. Firestone

Relaterte saker:

"Friends may come and go, but enemies accumulate." - Thomas Jones
Til Toppen
Vis Medlemmets Profil Send Privat Melding
Vis Innlegg fra:   
Start Nytt Tema   Svar på Tema    FrittForum Debatt Hovedsiden -> Forskjellig - Alt som ikke passer i andre grupper Alle klokkeslett er CET (Europa)
Side 1 av 1

Gå Til:  
Du kan ikke starte nye temaer i dette forumet
Du kan ikke svare på temaer i dette forumet
Du kan ikke endre dine egne innlegg i dette forumet
Du kan ikke slette dine egne innlegg i dette forumet
Du kan ikke delta i avstemninger i dette forumet

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Opprett ditt eget phpBB 2 forum gratis her | Personvern